Dear all,
I just came across a strange problem. And I can't seem to find a similar case anywhere. The background is that I have 3 sites, A, B and C.
A is connected to internet through a router 1 Gbps fibre. Equipment: NanoBeam
B is in line of sight of A and C. Equipment NanoBeam & NanoStation M5
C needs to connect through B to A. Equipment Nanostation M5
Original topology was
A to B: Nanobeam AP to Nanobeam station ptp in bridge mode
B to C: Nanostation AP to Nanostation ptp in bridge mode.
Nanobeam B was connected to Nanostation B over ethernet. All devices are on the same subnet and configured with the router IP as gateway
Due to proximity of devices at site B I decided to simplify the setup to:
Nanobeam A as station to Nanostation B AP ptmp in bridge mode
Nanostation C as station to Nanostation B AP ptmp in bridge mode
I selected the Nanostation over the Nanobeam at B due to the wider beam angle. All devices still on the same subnet as the gateway. After fiddling around with frequencies, bandwidth and power I got great links between AB and BC.
Then I discovered by monitoring the network that the router at A was starting to disconnect every 1-2 minutes. This never happened using the original link setup. Turning off Nanobeam A fixes the problem immediately.
Is it perhaps a problem to define Nanostation B as AP while the gateway is located at A behind Nanobeam A?
Could this possibly be caused by some routing conflicts causing load on the router?
Any other ideas?
Nanobeam, Nanostation and router in distress
-
Höfundur - Græningi
- Póstar: 43
- Skráði sig: Fim 15. Okt 2020 14:53
- Staða: Ótengdur
Re: Nanobeam, Nanostation and router in distress
Disable dhcp on them.
Let the router take care of that.
Let the router take care of that.
-
Höfundur - Græningi
- Póstar: 43
- Skráði sig: Fim 15. Okt 2020 14:53
- Staða: Ótengdur
Re: Nanobeam, Nanostation and router in distress
Thanks for the suggestion. I am pretty sure that none of the ubiquity equipment had DHCP enabled but it would be good to double check.
Site B and Site C are connected to the gateway subnet through seperate routers so A and C have their own subnet each. The WAN side of those routers is though connected to the same subnet as the gateway.
Site B and Site C are connected to the gateway subnet through seperate routers so A and C have their own subnet each. The WAN side of those routers is though connected to the same subnet as the gateway.
-
Höfundur - Græningi
- Póstar: 43
- Skráði sig: Fim 15. Okt 2020 14:53
- Staða: Ótengdur
Re: Nanobeam, Nanostation and router in distress
OK lausnin er komin.
Færði sum sé A frá "brigdge" mode yfir í "router". Bjó til sér subnet fyrir Unifi tækin og WAN hliðina á Router B og C. Þá hættu þessar truflanir sem tengdust fyrst og fremst IPTV merkinu.
Færði sum sé A frá "brigdge" mode yfir í "router". Bjó til sér subnet fyrir Unifi tækin og WAN hliðina á Router B og C. Þá hættu þessar truflanir sem tengdust fyrst og fremst IPTV merkinu.