Hvaða hd eru besti?


Ice master
Vélbúnaðarníðingur
Póstar: 343
Skráði sig: Mán 10. Jan 2005 22:34
Staðsetning: none
Hafðu samband:
Staða: Ótengdur

Póstur af Ice master »

ég er núna með 1 maxtor disk sem ég héf átt siðan i nóvember mjög gódur en fyrsti minn var wd hann hefur ekkert crasssasd neitt en hann er 112 gb en hann er með stæla núna og segjist vera með 111 gb :x
ég er bannaður...takk GuðjónR
Skjámynd

gnarr
Kóngur
Póstar: 6208
Skráði sig: Lau 29. Mar 2003 19:54
Staðsetning: Reykjavík
Staða: Ótengdur

Póstur af gnarr »

Ice master skrifaði:ég er núna með 1 maxtor disk sem ég héf átt siðan i nóvember mjög gódur en fyrsti minn var wd hann hefur ekkert crasssasd neitt en hann er 112 gb en hann er með stæla núna og segjist vera með 111 gb :x


á þetta ekki að vera: "hann er 112 db en hann er með stæla núna og segjist vera 111 db"
"Give what you can, take what you need."

W.Dafoe
Fiktari
Póstar: 89
Skráði sig: Þri 09. Nóv 2004 11:50
Staðsetning: VRII
Hafðu samband:
Staða: Ótengdur

Póstur af W.Dafoe »

Gerði smá test á file-servernum mínum:

hda: SAMSUNG SP1614N (Capacity: 149.05 GB)

test1:

/dev/hda:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 1.09 seconds =117.43 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.41 seconds = 45.39 MB/sec

test2:

/dev/hda:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.87 seconds =147.13 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.64 seconds = 39.02 MB/sec

hdb: WDC WD2000JB-00DUA0 (Capacity: 186.31 GB)

test1:

/dev/hdb:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.84 seconds =152.38 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.93 seconds = 33.16 MB/sec

test2

/dev/hdb:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.94 seconds =136.17 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.76 seconds = 36.36 MB/sec

hdc: ST3200822A (Capacity: 186.31 GB)

test1:

/dev/hdc:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.79 seconds =162.03 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.67 seconds = 38.32 MB/sec

test2:

/dev/hdc:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.80 seconds =160.00 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.25 seconds = 51.20 MB/sec

hde: WDC WD1200JB-00CRA1 (Capacity: 111.79 GB)

test1:

/dev/hde:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.85 seconds =150.59 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.66 seconds = 38.55 MB/sec

test2:

/dev/hde:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.79 seconds =162.03 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.64 seconds = 39.02 MB/sec

hdf: ST3120026A (Capacity: 111.76 GB)

test1:

/dev/hdf:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 1.00 seconds =128.00 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.51 seconds = 42.38 MB/sec

test2:

/dev/hdf:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.91 seconds =140.66 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.19 seconds = 53.78 MB/sec

hdg: ST3200822A (Capacity: 186.31 GB

test1:

/dev/hdg:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.80 seconds =160.00 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.10 seconds = 58.18 MB/sec

test2:

/dev/hdg:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.86 seconds =148.84 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.10 seconds = 58.18 MB/sec

hdh: IBM-DTLA-305030 (Capacity: 28.63 GB)

test1:

/dev/hdh:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.82 seconds =156.10 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: error



Hef mjög góða reynslu af WD, SEAGATE og SAMSUNG. Hinsvegar hafa 3 IBM diskar gefið upp öndina hjá mér. Mæli ekki með IBM né HITACHI.

kv. Ari Björnsson
kv, arib
Svara