
Hvaða hd eru besti?
-
- Vélbúnaðarníðingur
- Póstar: 343
- Skráði sig: Mán 10. Jan 2005 22:34
- Staðsetning: none
- Hafðu samband:
- Staða: Ótengdur
á þetta ekki að vera: "hann er 112 db en hann er með stæla núna og segjist vera 111 db"Ice master skrifaði:ég er núna með 1 maxtor disk sem ég héf átt siðan i nóvember mjög gódur en fyrsti minn var wd hann hefur ekkert crasssasd neitt en hann er 112 gb en hann er með stæla núna og segjist vera með 111 gb
"Give what you can, take what you need."
-
- Fiktari
- Póstar: 89
- Skráði sig: Þri 09. Nóv 2004 11:50
- Staðsetning: VRII
- Hafðu samband:
- Staða: Ótengdur
Gerði smá test á file-servernum mínum:
hda: SAMSUNG SP1614N (Capacity: 149.05 GB)
test1:
/dev/hda:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 1.09 seconds =117.43 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.41 seconds = 45.39 MB/sec
test2:
/dev/hda:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.87 seconds =147.13 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.64 seconds = 39.02 MB/sec
hdb: WDC WD2000JB-00DUA0 (Capacity: 186.31 GB)
test1:
/dev/hdb:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.84 seconds =152.38 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.93 seconds = 33.16 MB/sec
test2
/dev/hdb:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.94 seconds =136.17 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.76 seconds = 36.36 MB/sec
hdc: ST3200822A (Capacity: 186.31 GB)
test1:
/dev/hdc:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.79 seconds =162.03 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.67 seconds = 38.32 MB/sec
test2:
/dev/hdc:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.80 seconds =160.00 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.25 seconds = 51.20 MB/sec
hde: WDC WD1200JB-00CRA1 (Capacity: 111.79 GB)
test1:
/dev/hde:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.85 seconds =150.59 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.66 seconds = 38.55 MB/sec
test2:
/dev/hde:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.79 seconds =162.03 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.64 seconds = 39.02 MB/sec
hdf: ST3120026A (Capacity: 111.76 GB)
test1:
/dev/hdf:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 1.00 seconds =128.00 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.51 seconds = 42.38 MB/sec
test2:
/dev/hdf:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.91 seconds =140.66 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.19 seconds = 53.78 MB/sec
hdg: ST3200822A (Capacity: 186.31 GB
test1:
/dev/hdg:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.80 seconds =160.00 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.10 seconds = 58.18 MB/sec
test2:
/dev/hdg:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.86 seconds =148.84 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.10 seconds = 58.18 MB/sec
hdh: IBM-DTLA-305030 (Capacity: 28.63 GB)
test1:
/dev/hdh:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.82 seconds =156.10 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: error
Hef mjög góða reynslu af WD, SEAGATE og SAMSUNG. Hinsvegar hafa 3 IBM diskar gefið upp öndina hjá mér. Mæli ekki með IBM né HITACHI.
kv. Ari Björnsson
hda: SAMSUNG SP1614N (Capacity: 149.05 GB)
test1:
/dev/hda:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 1.09 seconds =117.43 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.41 seconds = 45.39 MB/sec
test2:
/dev/hda:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.87 seconds =147.13 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.64 seconds = 39.02 MB/sec
hdb: WDC WD2000JB-00DUA0 (Capacity: 186.31 GB)
test1:
/dev/hdb:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.84 seconds =152.38 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.93 seconds = 33.16 MB/sec
test2
/dev/hdb:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.94 seconds =136.17 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.76 seconds = 36.36 MB/sec
hdc: ST3200822A (Capacity: 186.31 GB)
test1:
/dev/hdc:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.79 seconds =162.03 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.67 seconds = 38.32 MB/sec
test2:
/dev/hdc:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.80 seconds =160.00 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.25 seconds = 51.20 MB/sec
hde: WDC WD1200JB-00CRA1 (Capacity: 111.79 GB)
test1:
/dev/hde:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.85 seconds =150.59 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.66 seconds = 38.55 MB/sec
test2:
/dev/hde:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.79 seconds =162.03 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.64 seconds = 39.02 MB/sec
hdf: ST3120026A (Capacity: 111.76 GB)
test1:
/dev/hdf:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 1.00 seconds =128.00 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.51 seconds = 42.38 MB/sec
test2:
/dev/hdf:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.91 seconds =140.66 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.19 seconds = 53.78 MB/sec
hdg: ST3200822A (Capacity: 186.31 GB
test1:
/dev/hdg:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.80 seconds =160.00 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.10 seconds = 58.18 MB/sec
test2:
/dev/hdg:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.86 seconds =148.84 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.10 seconds = 58.18 MB/sec
hdh: IBM-DTLA-305030 (Capacity: 28.63 GB)
test1:
/dev/hdh:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.82 seconds =156.10 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: error
Hef mjög góða reynslu af WD, SEAGATE og SAMSUNG. Hinsvegar hafa 3 IBM diskar gefið upp öndina hjá mér. Mæli ekki með IBM né HITACHI.
kv. Ari Björnsson
kv, arib